$ CelebPaid

How Much Did Vanessa Kirby Get Paid for The Fantastic Four: First Steps?

Vanessa Kirby's salary for playing Sue Storm / Invisible Woman in The Fantastic Four: First Steps (2025) has not been publicly disclosed. Critics singled Kirby out as the film's standout — the rare case where the co-lead arguably outshone the headliner. Her Marvel deal, like all MCU contracts, was never announced; its sequel options are where the real money likely sits.

By CelebPaid Research Team · Fact-checked against public reports
Category: Salaries Updated October 7, 2026 Read time ~7 min
Vanessa Kirby, Sue Storm / Invisible Woman in The Fantastic Four: First Steps
Vanessa Kirby as Sue Storm / Invisible Woman in The Fantastic Four: First Steps. Image via Wikimedia Commons
Reported salaryUndisclosed

No public figure; context below

ProjectThe Fantastic Four: First Steps (2025)

Vanessa Kirby as Sue Storm / Invisible Woman

Reported byNot reported

No credible report published

StatusPrivate

Industry context provided instead

The Short Answer

Let's be direct: nobody outside the deal knows what Vanessa Kirby was paid for playing Sue Storm / Invisible Woman in The Fantastic Four: First Steps (2025). The figure was never disclosed by the studio, the performer, or any credible trade report. Vanessa Kirby's salary for The Fantastic Four: First Steps was never publicly disclosed. She played Sue Storm in the $200-225 million MCU reboot that grossed over $505 million worldwide with an 86% Rotten Tomatoes score — Marvel's most successful 2025 release and the launch of a planned sequel.

That silence is the norm, not the exception. The overwhelming majority of acting salaries are never made public — the figures that do surface each year come from leaks, strategic disclosures, or journalists with sourcing inside agencies and studios. When none of those channels produces a number, the honest answer is 'undisclosed,' and this page is built around that honesty.

What exactly does the number cover? In standard Hollywood deal reporting, a salary figure like this one refers to the fixed compensation for the performance itself — it does not include the 10 percent that typically goes to the agent, nor management and legal fees, nor taxes. It also does not include backend participation unless stated. So the headline figure is both the most solid number available and, paradoxically, never the performer's actual take-home.

Why does a number like this become public at all? Usually because someone in the deal wanted it known. Agents leak favorable figures to establish a client's quote; studios leak them to signal confidence in a project; journalists publish them because readers are genuinely curious how the economics of fame work. The figures that stay secret are often the ones nobody benefits from disclosing.

The Deal in Numbers

  • Vanessa Kirby's salary: not publicly disclosed — no credible outlet has reported a figure.
  • Project: The Fantastic Four: First Steps (2025) — Vanessa Kirby as Sue Storm / Invisible Woman.
  • Production budget: $200-225 million (reported) — sets the ceiling for what the production could plausibly pay.
  • Comparable deal: Pedro Pascal — Undisclosed for First Steps (2025) (context, not Vanessa Kirby's salary).
  • Comparable deal: Vanessa Kirby — Undisclosed for Mission: Impossible — Dead Reckoning (2023) (context, not Vanessa Kirby's salary).
  • Comparable deal: Scarlett Johansson — $20M + backend for Jurassic World Rebirth (2025) (context, not Vanessa Kirby's salary).

The Pay Context

Because Vanessa Kirby's own figure was never disclosed, the table below shows verified deals for comparable talent in comparable projects. None of these is Vanessa Kirby's salary — they map the pay range this kind of work commands:

ActorRole / ProjectReported PayNotes
Pedro PascalFirst Steps (2025)UndisclosedComparable deal — context only
Vanessa KirbyMission: Impossible — Dead Reckoning (2023)UndisclosedComparable deal — context only
Scarlett JohanssonJurassic World Rebirth (2025)$20M + backendComparable deal — context only

Figures are reported estimates, not studio-confirmed amounts.

A few things to notice in the table above. First, every figure is an upfront guarantee — backend and bonuses, which can dwarf the base, are invisible here. Second, the numbers reflect negotiating leverage at signing, which is why an actor with a recent hit can out-earn a more famous co-star. Third, 'reported' matters: these are journalists' best estimates from sourced conversations, and while the sourcing here is strong, no studio has confirmed any of these numbers on the record.

Comparable Deals in Detail

No figure was disclosed for this project, so the honest substitute is comparables: verified deals for similar talent in similar projects. Each one below is labeled as context — none of them is the subject's salary — but together they draw the boundaries of the plausible pay range.

Pedro Pascal — Undisclosed for First Steps (2025). Her co-lead's fee was never reported either. The relevance is the tier: a proven performer carrying a project of similar scale, which is how agents establish what the market will bear.

Vanessa Kirby — Undisclosed for Mission: Impossible — Dead Reckoning (2023). Her franchise supporting fee was never published. Deals like this one are what agents screenshot and walk into their own negotiations — they set the pay band even when individual salaries stay private.

Scarlett Johansson — $20M + backend for Jurassic World Rebirth (2025). The rare published 2025 action-lead payday — the genre benchmark. The figure captures the performer's quote at that moment: a useful anchor for the range this kind of work commands, even though it says nothing direct about our subject.

The Career Context: Why This Was Vanessa Kirby's Market Rate

Kirby earned an Oscar nomination for Pieces of a Woman (2020), starred as Princess Margaret in The Crown (2016-2017), and joined the Mission: Impossible franchise. First Steps made her the MCU's Invisible Woman — a role she'll reprise in Avengers: Doomsday (2026).

That figure belongs to a specific era of entertainment economics. The streaming wars trained audiences — and agents — to expect eight-figure checks untethered from box office, because platforms were buying subscribers, not tickets. As the industry has sobered up, upfront pay has stayed high for proven draws while everyone else has felt the squeeze. This deal sits squarely in that transition: struck when the money was flowing freely, structured in the way the streaming era taught everyone to structure it.

Put Vanessa Kirby's deal next to Pedro Pascal's First Steps (2025) (Undisclosed) and Vanessa Kirby's Mission: Impossible — Dead Reckoning (2023) (Undisclosed), and the logic of the quote becomes visible: pay tracks recent commercial heat more closely than it tracks fame, awards, or tenure. An actor's salary is a lagging indicator of their last few projects' performance — which is why a single hit can reprice someone overnight, and why a quiet stretch can quietly discount them.

How Star Salaries Get Set

Understanding any single salary requires understanding the buyout. In the streaming era, platforms largely replaced theatrical backend — the profit participation that once made stars rich on hits — with upfront buyouts: bigger guaranteed checks in exchange for no share of the outcome. That is why streaming salaries often look inflated next to theatrical ones for comparable films. The actor trades the lottery ticket of backend for the certainty of cash; the platform trades cash for freedom from accounting disputes. Both sides usually consider it a fair trade.

The Bigger Picture

The broader pattern here is the one reshaping film salaries across the industry. Studios have grown disciplined about upfront pay, pushing compensation toward performance-linked structures — bonuses, backend, profit points — that pay stars like owners rather than employees. The actors who thrive in this system are the ones who negotiate participation, not just fees. The headline salary is the ante; the real game is what comes after.

There is a second-order effect worth noting: every major salary that becomes public becomes a comparable for the next negotiation. When a $20 million streaming deal leaks, ten other agents screenshot it and walk it into their own meetings. Public salary reporting doesn't just describe the market — it actively moves it, ratcheting quotes upward one disclosed deal at a time. That is why studios guard these numbers so jealously, and why the figures that do escape tend to be the ones someone wanted out.

About This Salary Figure

How to read the numbers on this page: unless stated otherwise, salary figures are upfront guarantees reported by trade or entertainment press, and they exclude backend, bonuses, and endorsement income unless we say otherwise. Where a number is unconfirmed or disputed, we label it as such. Our rule is simple — a missing number gets an honest 'undisclosed,' never a fabricated estimate dressed up as reporting.

For this article, the confirmed fact is the absence of a figure: neither the studio nor the performer's representatives has disclosed Vanessa Kirby's pay for The Fantastic Four: First Steps. Every number presented as context is labeled as context — a comparable deal, a budget figure, or an industry pay band — never as Vanessa Kirby's salary.

What would change this page: a sourced report from an established trade or entertainment outlet putting a number on the deal. If that happens, this article will be updated and the framing revised. Until then, 'undisclosed' is the only honest answer we can give.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who does Vanessa Kirby play in Fantastic Four?

Sue Storm, the Invisible Woman - widely praised as the film's standout.

What was Vanessa Kirby Oscar-nominated for?

Best Actress for Pieces of a Woman (2020).

Will Vanessa Kirby return as Sue Storm?

Yes - the character is set to appear in Avengers: Doomsday (2026).

How much did Vanessa Kirby get paid for The Fantastic Four: First Steps?

The figure has not been publicly disclosed. Neither the studio nor Vanessa Kirby's representatives have confirmed a salary, and no credible trade report has published one.

Why isn't Vanessa Kirby's The Fantastic Four: First Steps salary public?

Most acting salaries are private by default. Figures only surface through leaks, strategic disclosures, or sourced trade reporting — and for this project, none of those channels produced a number.

What do comparable actors earn for similar projects?

As context only: Pedro Pascal reportedly earned Undisclosed for First Steps (2025). That is a comparable deal, not Vanessa Kirby's salary — which remains undisclosed.

What was the budget of The Fantastic Four: First Steps?

The Fantastic Four: First Steps was made for a reported $200-225 million (reported). Big budgets don't automatically mean big salaries for every cast member, but they set the ceiling for what the production could plausibly pay its lead.

Could the real figure become public later?

Possibly. Salaries sometimes surface years after the fact — through profiles, legal filings, or retrospective trade reporting. If a credible figure emerges for Vanessa Kirby's The Fantastic Four: First Steps pay, this article will be updated.

Sources