How Much Did Sydney Sweeney Get Paid for Anyone But You?

The Short Answer

Let's be direct: nobody outside the deal knows what Sydney Sweeney was paid for playing Bea Messina in Anyone But You (2023). The figure was never disclosed by the studio, the performer, or any credible trade report. Sydney Sweeney's salary for Anyone But You was never publicly disclosed. She played Bea Messina opposite Glen Powell in Will Gluck's R-rated romantic comedy — a $25 million production that became a genuine phenomenon, grossing $220 million worldwide and single-handedly reviving the theatrical rom-com.

That silence is the norm, not the exception. The overwhelming majority of acting salaries are never made public — the figures that do surface each year come from leaks, strategic disclosures, or journalists with sourcing inside agencies and studios. When none of those channels produces a number, the honest answer is 'undisclosed,' and this page is built around that honesty.

What exactly does the number cover? In standard Hollywood deal reporting, a salary figure like this one refers to the fixed compensation for the performance itself — it does not include the 10 percent that typically goes to the agent, nor management and legal fees, nor taxes. It also does not include backend participation unless stated. So the headline figure is both the most solid number available and, paradoxically, never the performer's actual take-home.

Why does a number like this become public at all? Usually because someone in the deal wanted it known. Agents leak favorable figures to establish a client's quote; studios leak them to signal confidence in a project; journalists publish them because readers are genuinely curious how the economics of fame work. The figures that stay secret are often the ones nobody benefits from disclosing.

The Deal in Numbers

• Sydney Sweeney's salary: not publicly disclosed — no credible outlet has reported a figure.
• Project: Anyone But You (2023) — Sydney Sweeney as Bea Messina.
• Production budget: $25 million (reported) — sets the ceiling for what the production could plausibly pay.
• Comparable deal: Sydney Sweeney — Undisclosed for Anyone But You (2023) (context, not Sydney Sweeney's salary).
• Comparable deal: Glen Powell — Undisclosed for Anyone But You (2023) (context, not Sydney Sweeney's salary).
• Comparable deal: Adria Arjona — Undisclosed for Hit Man (2023) (context, not Sydney Sweeney's salary).

The Pay Context

Because Sydney Sweeney's own figure was never disclosed, the table below shows verified deals for comparable talent in comparable projects. None of these is Sydney Sweeney's salary — they map the pay range this kind of work commands:

Figures are reported estimates, not studio-confirmed amounts.

A few things to notice in the table above. First, every figure is an upfront guarantee — backend and bonuses, which can dwarf the base, are invisible here. Second, the numbers reflect negotiating leverage at signing, which is why an actor with a recent hit can out-earn a more famous co-star. Third, 'reported' matters: these are journalists' best estimates from sourced conversations, and while the sourcing here is strong, no studio has confirmed any of these numbers on the record.

Comparable Deals in Detail

No figure was disclosed for this project, so the honest substitute is comparables: verified deals for similar talent in similar projects. Each one below is labeled as context — none of them is the subject's salary — but together they draw the boundaries of the plausible pay range.

Sydney Sweeney — Undisclosed for Anyone But You (2023). Her producer credit means backend participation was possible — but unreported. The relevance is the tier: a proven performer carrying a project of similar scale, which is how agents establish what the market will bear.

Glen Powell — Undisclosed for Anyone But You (2023). His co-lead fee was never published either. Deals like this one are what agents screenshot and walk into their own negotiations — they set the pay band even when individual salaries stay private.

Adria Arjona — Undisclosed for Hit Man (2023). Another 2023 rom-com lead whose fee stayed private. The figure captures the performer's quote at that moment: a useful anchor for the range this kind of work commands, even though it says nothing direct about our subject.

The Career Context: Why This Was Sydney Sweeney's Market Rate

Sweeney broke through on Euphoria (2019-) and The White Lotus (2021), earning two Emmy nominations. Anyone But You made her a movie star and a producer to watch — she has since headlined Immaculate (2024) and launched her own production ambitions.

That figure is the reported upfront salary — the guaranteed check, before any bonuses, backend participation, or profit points. In today's Hollywood, the headline number is rarely the whole story: for films expected to perform, studios routinely trade a lower upfront fee for a share of the outcome, which means the final payday can end up multiples higher than the announced salary. When a project overperforms, it is the backend — not the base — that creates the truly enormous paydays, and it is why two actors with identical upfront fees can walk away with wildly different totals.

Put Sydney Sweeney's deal next to Sydney Sweeney's Anyone But You (2023) (Undisclosed) and Glen Powell's Anyone But You (2023) (Undisclosed), and the logic of the quote becomes visible: pay tracks recent commercial heat more closely than it tracks fame, awards, or tenure. An actor's salary is a lagging indicator of their last few projects' performance — which is why a single hit can reprice someone overnight, and why a quiet stretch can quietly discount them.

How Star Salaries Get Set

Understanding any single salary requires understanding the buyout. In the streaming era, platforms largely replaced theatrical backend — the profit participation that once made stars rich on hits — with upfront buyouts: bigger guaranteed checks in exchange for no share of the outcome. That is why streaming salaries often look inflated next to theatrical ones for comparable films. The actor trades the lottery ticket of backend for the certainty of cash; the platform trades cash for freedom from accounting disputes. Both sides usually consider it a fair trade.

The Bigger Picture

Step back and this deal is a small window into how the movie business currently prices stardom. The theatrical market has bifurcated: a handful of franchise films command massive budgets and massive star salaries, while everything else gets made for less, with less. In that environment, a star's quote has become a bet the studio places on opening weekend — and the size of the bet tells you exactly how confident the studio was.

There is a second-order effect worth noting: every major salary that becomes public becomes a comparable for the next negotiation. When a $20 million streaming deal leaks, ten other agents screenshot it and walk it into their own meetings. Public salary reporting doesn't just describe the market — it actively moves it, ratcheting quotes upward one disclosed deal at a time. That is why studios guard these numbers so jealously, and why the figures that do escape tend to be the ones someone wanted out.

About This Salary Figure

How to read the numbers on this page: unless stated otherwise, salary figures are upfront guarantees reported by trade or entertainment press, and they exclude backend, bonuses, and endorsement income unless we say otherwise. Where a number is unconfirmed or disputed, we label it as such. Our rule is simple — a missing number gets an honest 'undisclosed,' never a fabricated estimate dressed up as reporting.

For this article, the confirmed fact is the absence of a figure: neither the studio nor the performer's representatives has disclosed Sydney Sweeney's pay for Anyone But You. Every number presented as context is labeled as context — a comparable deal, a budget figure, or an industry pay band — never as Sydney Sweeney's salary.

What would change this page: a sourced report from an established trade or entertainment outlet putting a number on the deal. If that happens, this article will be updated and the framing revised. Until then, 'undisclosed' is the only honest answer we can give.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sources