How Much Did Meryl Streep Get Paid for Only Murders in the Building?

The Short Answer

Let's be direct: nobody outside the deal knows what Meryl Streep was paid for playing Loretta Durkin in Only Murders in the Building (2025). The figure was never disclosed by the studio, the performer, or any credible trade report. Meryl Streep's salary for Only Murders in the Building was never publicly disclosed. The three-time Oscar winner joined in season 3 (2023) as Loretta Durkin, the struggling actress who becomes Oliver Putnam's wife — a recurring guest arc across seasons 3-5 that earned her Emmy nominations and some of the show's best scenes.

That silence is the norm, not the exception. The overwhelming majority of acting salaries are never made public — the figures that do surface each year come from leaks, strategic disclosures, or journalists with sourcing inside agencies and studios. When none of those channels produces a number, the honest answer is 'undisclosed,' and this page is built around that honesty.

What exactly does the number cover? In standard Hollywood deal reporting, a salary figure like this one refers to the fixed compensation for the performance itself — it does not include the 10 percent that typically goes to the agent, nor management and legal fees, nor taxes. It also does not include backend participation unless stated. So the headline figure is both the most solid number available and, paradoxically, never the performer's actual take-home.

Why does a number like this become public at all? Usually because someone in the deal wanted it known. Agents leak favorable figures to establish a client's quote; studios leak them to signal confidence in a project; journalists publish them because readers are genuinely curious how the economics of fame work. The figures that stay secret are often the ones nobody benefits from disclosing.

The Deal in Numbers

• Meryl Streep's salary: not publicly disclosed — no credible outlet has reported a figure.
• Project: Only Murders in the Building (2025) — Meryl Streep as Loretta Durkin.
• Network/platform: Hulu — platform pay bands inform the context below.
• Comparable deal: Martin Short — Undisclosed for Only Murders (2021-2025) (context, not Meryl Streep's salary).
• Comparable deal: Jennifer Aniston — $2M/ep for The Morning Show (context, not Meryl Streep's salary).
• Comparable deal: Nicole Kidman — Undisclosed for Special Ops: Lioness (2023-2026) (context, not Meryl Streep's salary).

The Pay Context

Because Meryl Streep's own figure was never disclosed, the table below shows verified deals for comparable talent in comparable projects. None of these is Meryl Streep's salary — they map the pay range this kind of work commands:

Figures are reported estimates, not studio-confirmed amounts.

Reading a salary table like this one is an exercise in Hollywood semiotics. Billing order and pay order do not always match: the biggest star is not always the highest-paid, because pay reflects the deal struck at a specific moment, not a permanent ranking. Equal pay among co-stars usually signals a deliberate packaging decision — often to avoid the press cycle that erupts when a gap leaks. And when one actor earns multiples of another on the same project, the gap almost always maps to a gap in recent box-office leverage, not screen time.

Comparable Deals in Detail

No figure was disclosed for this project, so the honest substitute is comparables: verified deals for similar talent in similar projects. Each one below is labeled as context — none of them is the subject's salary — but together they draw the boundaries of the plausible pay range.

Martin Short — Undisclosed for Only Murders (2021-2025). Her co-star's series-regular fee was never reported either. The relevance is the tier: a proven performer carrying a project of similar scale, which is how agents establish what the market will bear.

Jennifer Aniston — $2M/ep for The Morning Show. The reported streaming benchmark for an A-list female lead. Deals like this one are what agents screenshot and walk into their own negotiations — they set the pay band even when individual salaries stay private.

Nicole Kidman — Undisclosed for Special Ops: Lioness (2023-2026). Her fellow film legend's streaming-series fee was never published. The figure captures the performer's quote at that moment: a useful anchor for the range this kind of work commands, even though it says nothing direct about our subject.

The Career Context: Why This Was Meryl Streep's Market Rate

Streep holds the record for most Academy Award nominations (21) with three wins — for Kramer vs. Kramer (1979), Sophie's Choice (1982), and The Iron Lady (2011). Only Murders was her first major TV comedy role, following Big Little Lies (2019).

That figure belongs to a specific era of entertainment economics. The streaming wars trained audiences — and agents — to expect eight-figure checks untethered from box office, because platforms were buying subscribers, not tickets. As the industry has sobered up, upfront pay has stayed high for proven draws while everyone else has felt the squeeze. This deal sits squarely in that transition: struck when the money was flowing freely, structured in the way the streaming era taught everyone to structure it.

Put Meryl Streep's deal next to Martin Short's Only Murders (2021-2025) (Undisclosed) and Jennifer Aniston's The Morning Show ($2M/ep), and the logic of the quote becomes visible: pay tracks recent commercial heat more closely than it tracks fame, awards, or tenure. An actor's salary is a lagging indicator of their last few projects' performance — which is why a single hit can reprice someone overnight, and why a quiet stretch can quietly discount them.

How Star Salaries Get Set

There is also the question of who knew the number before it reached the press. Salary information travels through a small circuit: the agency that negotiated it, the studio business-affairs department that approved it, the payroll company that processed it, and the lawyers on both sides. Leaks typically come from the side that benefits — usually the actor's camp, establishing a quote for the next negotiation. That selection bias is worth remembering: the salaries we hear about are disproportionately the impressive ones.

The Bigger Picture

The bigger story is the streaming-driven inflation of TV salaries. When platforms were spending to acquire subscribers at any cost, per-episode fees detached from anything broadcast television had ever paid — and they never fully came back down. Even as the industry tightens, established stars continue to command the quotes set during the peak years. Each deal like this one becomes the comparable cited in the next negotiation.

There is a second-order effect worth noting: every per-episode figure that becomes public becomes ammunition for the next negotiation. When a $1 million episodic fee leaks, it resets expectations across the industry — showrunners budget against it, agents demand it, and platforms either pay it or lose the talent. Public salary reporting doesn't just describe the TV market; it actively reprices it, one disclosed deal at a time.

About This Salary Figure

On sourcing: the salary figures here come from public reporting by established entertainment journalists, each cited by name. Hollywood pay is private by default — no studio publishes a payroll — so 'reported' is doing real work in these sentences. It means a professional journalist staked their reputation on the number. That is the strongest form of evidence available for this kind of information, and also its limit.

For this article, the confirmed fact is the absence of a figure: neither the studio nor the performer's representatives has disclosed Meryl Streep's pay for Only Murders in the Building. Every number presented as context is labeled as context — a comparable deal, a budget figure, or an industry pay band — never as Meryl Streep's salary.

What would change this page: a sourced report from an established trade or entertainment outlet putting a number on the deal. If that happens, this article will be updated and the framing revised. Until then, 'undisclosed' is the only honest answer we can give.

Frequently Asked Questions

Sources